skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173901acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access
Best Paper

Streets for People: Engaging Children in Placemaking Through a Socio-technical Process

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a socio-technical process designed to engage children in an ongoing urban design project-Streets for People-in Newcastle, UK. We translated urban design proposals developed by residents and the local authority to enable children to contribute ideas to the project. Our process comprised three stages: situated explorations and evidence gathering through digitally supported neighbourhood walks; issue mapping and peer-to-peer discussions using an online engagement platform; and face-to-face dialogue between children, residents, and the local authority through a 'Town Hall' event. We report insights gained through our engagement and show how our activities facilitated issue advocacy and the development of children's capacities, but also surfaced tensions around the agency of children in political processes. We reflect on the challenges of working in this space, and discuss wider implications for technology design and ethical questions that 'scaling up' such work might pose.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3010.mp4

mp4

258.4 MB

References

  1. Alissa Antle. 2017. Crazy Like Us: Design for Vulnerable Populations. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17), 3--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: supporting community activists on the ground. Cscw 2015: 1694--1703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2017. Tap the Button: A Design-Based Inquiry into Issue Advocacy and Digital Civics. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6304--6316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mariam Asad, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Becky Nielsen, and Kate Diedrick. 2017. Creating a Sociotechnical API: Designing City-Scale Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2295--2306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tom P. Bakker and Claes H. de Vreese. 2011. Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation. Communication Research 38, 4: 451--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. W. Lance Bennett, Chris Wells, and Allison Rank. 2009. Young citizens and civic learning: two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies 13, 2: 105--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kirsten Boehner and Carl DiSalvo. 2016. Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2970--2981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harry C. Boyte. 2004. Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Bart Cammaerts, Michael Bruter, Shakuntala Banaji, Sarah Harrison, and Nick Anstead. 2016. Youth Participation in Democratic Life: Stories of Hope and Disillusion. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Barry Checkoway, Katie Richards-Schuster, Shakira Abdullah, Margarita Aragon, Evelyn Facio, Lisa Figueroa, Ellen Reddy, Mary Welsh, and Al White. 2003. Young people as competent citizens. Community Development Journal 38, 4: 298--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Keith Cheverst, Helen Turner, Trien Do, and Dan Fitton. 2017. Supporting the consumption and coauthoring of locative media experiences for a rural village community: design and field trial evaluation of the SHARC2.0 framework. Multimedia Tools and Applications 76, 4: 5243--5274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Commonplace. 2017. Commonplace - Online Community Consultation Platform. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from http://www.commonplace.isGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, John Bowers, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. A Pool of Dreams: Facebook, Politics and the Emergence of a Social Movement. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 3573--3582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, Martyn DadeRobertson, Simon J. Bowen, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. Contesting the City: Enacting the Political Through Digitally Supported Urban Walks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2853--2862. Retrieved from Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Clara Crivellaro, Alex Taylor, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Rob Comber, Bettina Nissen, and Peter Wright. 2016. Re-Making Places: HCI, 'Community Building" and Change. In CHI'16, May 07--12, 2016, San Jose, CA, USA, 2958--2969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Barry Cullingworth, Vincent Nadin, Trevor Hart, Simin Davoudi, John Pendlebury, Geoff Vigar, David Webb, and Tim Townshend. 2014. Town and Country Planning in the UK. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Peter Dalsgaard. 2008. Designing for Inquisitive Use. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '08), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Christopher A Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2: 241--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Laurie Day, Liz Sutton, and Jenkins Sarah. 2011. Children and young people's participation in planning and regeneration: a final report to the Ecorys Research Programme 2010--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Victoria Derr, Louise Chawla, Mara Mintzer, Debra Flanders Cushing, and Willem Van Vliet. 2013. A City for All Citizens: Integrating Children and Youth from Marginalized Populations into City Planning. Buildings 3, 3: 482--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tawanna Dillahunt, Olga Lyra, Mary L. Barreto, and Evangelos Karapanos. 2017. Reducing children's psychological distance from climate change via ecofeedback technologies. International Journal of ChildComputer Interaction 13, Supplement C: 19--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bent Flyvbjerg. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marcus Foth. 2011. From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Marcus Foth, Bhishna Bajracharya, Ross Brown, and Greg Hearn. 2009. The Second Life of urban planning? Using NeoGeography tools for community engagement. Journal of Location Based Services 3, 2: 97--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kathryn Frank. 2006. The Potential of Youth Participation in Planning. Journal of Planning Literature 20, 4: 351--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Claire Freeman and Paul Tranter. 2012. Children and their Urban Environment: Changing Worlds. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Anita Harris, Johanna Wyn, and Salem Younes. 2010. Beyond apathetic or activist youth: "Ordinary" young people and contemporary forms of participation. Young 18, 1: 9--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Roger A. Hart. 2008. Stepping Back from "The Ladder": Reflections on a Model of Participatory Work with Children. In Participation and Learning: Perspectives on Education and the Environment, Health and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht, 19--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jane Jacobs. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Reinout Kleinhans, Maarten Van Ham, and Jennifer Evans-Cowley. 2015. Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and SelfOrganization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance. Planning Practice & Research 30, 3: 237--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaité, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. "Everyone Is Talking About It!": A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 3127--3136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Michiel de Lange and Martijn de Waal. 2013. Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday 18, 11. Retrieved April 21, 2017 from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/49Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Christopher A. Le Dantec, Mariam Asad, Aditi Misra, and Kari E Watkins. 2015. Planning with Crowdsourced Data. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15: 1717--1727. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Laura Lentini and Françoise Decortis. 2010. Space and places: when interacting with and in physical space becomes a meaningful experience. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 5: 407--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Brian D. Loader, Ariadne Vromen, and Michael A. Xenos. 2014. The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society 17, 2: 143--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2015. Taking {A}part: The Politics and Aesthetics of Participation in Experience-Centered Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. mySociety. FixMyStreet. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://www.fixmystreet.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Newcastle City Council. 2015. Digital by Choice: 2015/16 Budget Proposal Integrated Impact Assessment. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://www.newcastle.gov.uk/node/104825Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. William Odom, Richard Banks, Abigail Durrant, David Kirk, and James Pierce. 2012. Slow Technology: Critical Reflection and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12), 816--817. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Patrick Olivier and Peter Wright. 2015. Digital civics. Interactions 22, 4: 61--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Barry Percy-Smith. 2010. Councils, consultations and community: rethinking the spaces for children and young people's participation. Children's Geographies 8, 2: 107--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Anthony T. Pinter, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, and Jack M. Caroll. 2017. Adolescent Online Safety: Moving Beyond Formative Evaluations to Designing Solutions for the Future. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17), 352--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Keith F. Punch. 2013. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Aare Puussaar, Adrian K. Clear, and Peter Wright. 2017. Enhancing Personal Informatics Through Social Sensemaking. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 6936--6942. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society 27, 4: 252--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Janet C. Read, Daniel Fitton, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Giving Ideas an Equal Chance: Inclusion and Representation in Participatory Design with Children. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '14), 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Janet C. Read, Matthew Horton, Gavin Sim, Peggy Gregory, Daniel Fitton, and Brendan Cassidy. 2013. CHECk: A Tool to Inform and Encourage Ethical Practice in Participatory Design with Children. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), 187--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Gwyther Rees, Sabine Andresen, and Jonathan Richard Bradshaw. 2016. Children's Views on Their Lives and Well-being in 16 Countries?: A report on the Children's Worlds survey of children aged eight years old 2013--15. University of York, York. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/95207/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Karen Renaud and Joseph Maguire. 2015. Regulating Access to Adult Content (with Privacy Preservation). In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 4019--4028. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Dan Richardson, Clara Crivellaro, Ahmed Kharrufa, Kyle Montague, and Patrick Olivier. 2017. Exploring Public Places As Infrastructures for Civic M-Learning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '17), 222--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Jennifer A. Rode. 2009. Digital Parenting: Designing Children's Safety. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCSHCI '09), 244--251. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1671011.1671041 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Yvonne Rydin. 2015. Five Radical Ideas for a Better Planning System. University College London, London. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/planning/research/fiveradical-ideas-better-planning-systemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Joanna Catherine Saad-Sulonen and Liisa Horelli. 2010. The value of Community Informatics to participatory urban planning and design: a case-study in Helsinki. The Journal of Community Informatics 6, 2: 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Tania M. Schusler, Marianne E. Krasny, Scott J. Peters, and Daniel J. Decker. 2009. Developing citizens and communities through youth environmental action. Environmental Education Research 15, 1: 111--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. E. Seltzer and D. Mahmoudi. 2013. Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning. Journal of Planning Literature 28, 1: 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Amartya Sen. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. David Williamson Shaffer and Mitchel Resnick. 1999. "Thick" Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 10, 2: 195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Cristiana S. Silva, Glívia A.R. Barbosa, Ismael S. Silva, Tatiane S. Silva, Fernando Mourão, and Flávio Coutinho. 2017. Privacy for Children and Teenagers on Social Networks from a Usability Perspective: A Case Study on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (WebSci '17), 63--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community. 2863-- 2872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Mark Tewdwr-Jones, John Goddard, and Paul Cowie. 2015. Newcastle City Futures 2065 Report. Newcastle Institute for Social Renewal, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from http://www.newcastlecityfutures.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/11/NewcastleCityFutures2065Re port.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Kay E. M. Tisdall. 2008. Is the Honeymoon Over? Children and Young People's Participation in Public Decision-Making. The International Journal of Children's Rights 16, 3: 419--429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 429--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Eric Gordon, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2016. Digital Civics: Citizen Empowerment With and Through Technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 1096-- 1099. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. William Hollingsworth Whyte. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Alexander Wilson, Mark Tewdwr-Jones, and Rob Comber. 2017. Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science: 239980831771251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Jill Palzkill Woelfer and David G. Hendry. 2010. Homeless Young People's Experiences with Information Systems: Life and Work in a Community Technology Center. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10), 1291--1300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Gavin Wood, John Vines, Madeline Balaam, Nick Taylor, Thomas Smith, Clara Crivellaro, Juliana Mensah, Helen Limon, John Challis, Linda Anderson, Adam Clarke, and Peter C. Wright. 2014. The Department of Hidden Stories: Playful Digital Storytelling for Children in a Public Library. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1885--1894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Pamela Wridt. 2010. A Qualitative GIS Approach to Mapping Urban Neighborhoods with Children to Promote Physical Activity and Child-Friendly Community Planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37, 1: 129--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Streets for People: Engaging Children in Placemaking Through a Socio-technical Process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader